Search the ETC Tax Website

Request a callback

Callback Request

Please provide as much detail as possible in regards to the reason for your enquiry so our tax advisers can prepare and tailor their response to reflect your needs. We will endeavour to call you back to discuss your enquiry and you will not be charged for this time.

  • Sign-up to our newsletter

    Newsletter Main Form

  • Aardman Founders Sell to Employee Ownership Trust

    14 January 2019

    The Right Structure for the The Wrong Trousers: Aardman founders sell to Employee Ownership Trust

    Aardman Animation are pioneers of stop-motion animation, the creators of international icons of modern British culture, Wallace & Gromit, as well as a string of other successes such as Shaun the Sheep, Flushed Away and Chicken Run.

    Peter Lord and David Sproxton, Aardman’s founders, recently announced the sale of 75% of their shares in the company to an Employee Ownership Trust (EOT) for the benefit of the company’s employees.

    We have previously highlighted the tax advantages of EOT and the qualifying conditions. However, the attractions extend beyond tax.

    Selling to an Employee Ownership Trust. It’s not just tax…

    Business owners have a range of succession planning strategies open to them from management buyouts to sales to third parties, each with different tax and commercial implications.

    The tax-advantages of disposing of shares to an EOT are clear. But Spoxton and Lord’s reasons for choosing this route over sale to a third party provide a great illustration of the potential benefits of selling to an EOT.

    An alternative method of sale may have seen Aardman Animation sold to a ‘major studio’. However, Sproxton and Lord consider that such a sale would,

    “just become an asset on the balance sheet to be traded. They could say, let’s turn it all over to CGI and shoot it in Singapore.”

    Employee ownership will ensure that Aardman will not have to ‘dance to anybody else’s tune’. In short, by selling the shares to an EOT, they will ensure the continued independence of the company.

    If a controlling interest in the company was sold to a third-party purchaser, other considerations, such as profit margins, might become a significant factor in decision-making processes. Moreover, changes to the business might adversely impact the employees who have contributed to the current success of the company, particularly if work was moved to low-cost jurisdictions.

    Ultimately, it might change the culture and creative direction of the company.

    Both Sproxton and Lord plan to continue with the company, Sproxton continuing as Managing Director while the company identifies a successor, while Lord will remain Creative Director.

    Would you like to find out more about EOT’s?

    The transfer of such a high profile, successful business to an EOT will ensure that these structures should be on the list of potential exit strategies. Particularly for founders who wish to secure the future of a distinct business ethos, thereby creating a legacy and ensuring the ongoing success of the business that they have founded, the attractions of an EOT could prove decisive.

    If you or your clients need help with this or Employee Share Schemes, even a similar issue, or indeed if there are any other tax issues that you feel we may be able to help you with, please contact us at or on 01925 363006. You can also read more about Exit Planning below…

    [su_posts template=”templates/teaser-loop.php” posts_per_page=”5″ tax_term=”1484″ order=”desc”]